Search in This Site

Eva's tip on finding Mr. Right

Desperate Housewives' star Eva Longoria Parker, 33, has doled out some advice to single women who are looking for Mr
Eva Longoria
Eva Longoria (Reuters photo) More Pics
Right.


The actress, who found love at 32, advises women to be open to dating if they would like to find their life partners.

"Just get out there and meet people," the Daily Telegraph quoted her as saying. "I think sometimes women are stuck in a type. I've never dated the same type. I fall in love with personalities and they come in different packages," she added.

For her, the qualities she looks for in her perfect man are intelligence, humour and passion, the qualities, which attracted her to her 26-year-old husband Tony Parker.

Was Britney in India?

Is Britney Spears really dating dancer Sandip Soparrkar, as her manager ostensibly claims? Did she come to India primarily to meet Sandip?
Britney
Morphed picture of Britney Spears and Sandip Soparrkar. For original click here


Was she here at all? DT uncovers contradictions and inconsistencies in the reports, emanating from many ‘sources’ & identities, about Britney’s purported visit to Jodhpur

Four days ago, there was news that Britney Spears had landed in Jodhpur to rehearse for the second video of her single, Womanizer, which dancer Sandip Soparrkar had been signed on to choreograph.

That news came amid buzz that Britney had actually come to see Sandip, with whom she was speculated to be having an affair.

The media, including DT, had carried those stories, and Sandip’s official denials, as also earlier news about Sandip’s performance at Madonna’s 50th birthday bash in England, and his attending a counselling session for her before her marriage to Guy Ritchie broke up. However, what DT didn’t publish were the most recent reports, that got us curious, sent ostensibly by Britney’s manager, Larry Rudolph, saying that Britney got her room in her Jodhpur hotel, Umaid Bhawan, shifted to one that had an interconnecting door to Sandip’s, and that after a workout, they both “locked themselves up” for an hour. The insinuation in this and other reports was clearly that Britney and Sandip were having an affair. A photo, supposedly of Sandip and Britney at Jodhpur, sent to us, again by ‘Larry’, is the one you see above – a clearly morphed picture with Sandip’s face tacked on to a picture of someone standing with Britney. The original, which is actually an old picture of Britney and Neil Patrick Harrison, is next to it.

All of this has been circulated by ‘Larry’ from Sandip’s email ID, and the same picture was mailed to our sister publication in Jaipur, this time by Sandip’s manager, and not by ‘Larry’ – but again from Sandip’s email ID. DT spoke to Sandip, his partner Jessy Randhawa, the hotel that Britney was supposed to be staying at in Jodhpur (she’s supposed to have left in the morning on December 29), and the CISF, that normally would provide some security cover to Britney if an international celebrity of her standing were landing at an Indian airport, and found more than a few glaring inconsistencies. You decide...

‘Maybe Britney wants a push in India?’
When first asked if Britney was in India, Jessy said, “You’ll have to ask Britney or Sandip. I wasn’t in Jodhpur.” But later, when contacted again, she said, “Yes, she was. For two days.” When told that there is not a single picture of hers in India, Jessy replied, “She came for two days, she rehearsed and she left. Sandip and I had a shoot this afternoon (on December 29, in Mumbai) which got cancelled, but he was here at 8 am. I’ve been in touch with Sandip’s manager, and I know what’s going on.” What about Britney’s quotes saying she’s spending New Year’s Eve with Sandip? “Sandip is here in Mumbai, how can he be spending New Year’s Eve with her?” Jessy asked.

She said that the media has often circulated stories about Sandip that aren’t true, and that it’s getting out of hand now. The last big news, of them performing at Madonna’s birthday bash – is that also inaccurate? “Yes, it is inaccurate. First, we played along thinking, whatever, but then it became too much – Julia Roberts commenting on my beauty and etc, and now, the papers say that Britney met Sandip at Madonna’s birthday party. How can that be? I never met Julia. We were very much in town (Mumbai),” she replied. “Now, it’s being said that Sandip laughed about it (the affair with Britney) and making it out like that Sandip’s dating Britney, which is not true... I’ve been in touch with Sandip throughout his two-day stay in Jodhpur, and he said there are things appearing in the media and do not believe it.” How come neither she nor Sandip ever spoke up about these reports earlier, if they were false? “See for us, it’s just publicity, just hype. Write it. But it’s getting it out of hand now,” she replied. “Sandip has denied that there’s any love angle and she’s come here only for work... I don’t know what’s going on, Sandip says he does not know what’s going on, and we’re not clear who’s doing this.” But why would someone cook up complimentary stories about them, we asked her. “All these women who’re coming here, they want some media attention, and they want something to be talked about after they leave. It’s good for their work also,” she replied. Does Britney need a Soparrkar link-up to stay in the news? “No... but maybe she wants a little more push in India?” she said uncertainly. “I don’t think it’s Sandip who’s actually doing this. This is being done by the same people who spread the London story... Maybe Madonna is too impressed with him...” So Madonna fed a positive story about Sandip Soparrkar, and Britney Spears fed another? “He must have just played along with the story, because it came internationally...” she said. “People who are crazy about being in the media, they can lie to you sometimes. But he doesn’t have the power, if you’re blaming him... the whole country’s writing about him, isn’t it?”

Larry wanted to fuel rumours’

Sandip strenuously denies having anything romantic to do with Britney. But then, who’s spreading these stories and sending fabricated pictures? “Larry Rudolph – he is Britney’s manager, and he had come with her when she travelled here for the weekend, and he said he had issues with his laptop and his internet connection was not working very well, so if he could mail it from my ID, so I said he could. And when he was working on my comp, I wasn’t there, so I don’t know what he sent,” said Sandip. How can he disown accountability for something sent from his laptop, his ID, and not even see what was being sent? “He being the spokesperson and manager for her, I don’t know what he sent. He’s kind of rude, so I didn’t converse much with him.” Sandip knew nothing of it at all? “Larry had said he wanted to fuel certain things about Britney and get promotion for the video which will soon be released in Asia and Australia. So I told him if you want to use something to fuel, it’s okay, it’s fine with me, not a problem, but if it’s going to get a little too much, I don’t want my life to get affected with it, you know,” replied Sandip. When we mentioned the doctored picture, he said, “He’s not even shown me what pictures he has.” What about them “locking themselves up” for an hour, like ‘Larry’ is suggesting? “We did, but for rehearsal,” Sandip replied.

Did he go to Madonna’s birthday bash? “Yes, but we are not supposed to talk about it in public.” He and Jessy both went? “Yes, we both danced there together.”

What would he say if Jessy were to include the England visit in the list of ‘fake’ things that the media’s writing? “That she’s saying because we’re not supposed to talk about it.” If a channel asks you tomorrow on live TV, are you dating Britney, will you say you are? “No, I will say I’m dating Jessy... I have laughed (when asked about it earlier) because it’s really funny, and I have said I’m meeting her for work. Larry, being her spokesperson, has maybe added his two bits to it.”

Alright, then, when did Britney come to India, and when did she leave? “She came late Friday night... Saturday morning. She left this morning (on December 29) at about 2-2.30 am.” Where were they staying? “Umaid Bhawan.” She came by chartered flight? “Yes.” Directly to and from Jodhpur? “I assume so, I don’t know, I didn’t ask questions about that,” is what Sandip had to say.

You could party with a rock star on New Year's Eve

LOS ANGELES – Why not share a shot with Paris Hilton or boogie down with Pete Wentz to ring in 2009? This year, any regular Joe with dough (and no reason to sweat the economy) could party like — and with — a rock star, movie star or reality TV star on New Year's Eve.

Here's a look at some of the parties that were boasting famous names:

• Paris Hilton was to host the Bongo Virus party at the Trademark nightclub in Sydney, Australia. Tickets were $129.

New York City's biggest party was arguably the annual ball drop in Times Square. This year's celebration was to feature performances by Lionel Richie, Taylor Swift and the Jonas Brothers, along with appearances by Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton and former President Bill Clinton. Admission was free. Meanwhile, Mario Lopez was to host a party at the Marquee nightclub (tickets: $165) and actress Emmanuelle Chriqui and blogger Perez Hilton were to host a party at Hotel Gansevoort (admission: $200).

Lindsay Lohan was to helm the festivities as gal pal Samantha Ronson spun the tunes at Mansion nightclub in Miami. Admission was $200. Also in Miami: John Legend was to appear at Prive (tickets: $200); T.I. was to perform and Chloe Sevigny was to host at Gansevoort South (admission started at $225); Diddy, Molly Sims, Adam Levine and James Valentine of Maroon 5 were to appear at separate parties at Fontainebleau (admission: $400 for each event); and Busta Rhymes was to perform at the Shore Club (tickets started at $275).

• How much was it to party with a star in Las Vegas? That depends on your definition of a star. You could celebrate the New Year with new parents Ashlee Simpson- Wentz and Pete Wentz at Pure nightclub for $200; share a toast with Kim Kardashian and her sisters at LAX for $150; or raise a glass with Heidi Montag and Spencer Pratt at the Christian Audigier nightclub for $125. Also in Vegas: Usher was to appear at the Bank nightclub inside the Bellagio (tickets: $200), and Denise Richards and Lance Bass were to host as Run DMC provided the beats at Prive nightclub inside the Planet Hollywood hotel (admission: $200).

• Just months after surviving a fiery plane crash, Travis Barker and DJ AM (Adam Goldstein) were set to usher in the New Year at the Wilshire Theater in Los Angeles. Tickets were $90. Their performance was to be broadcast live online and at nine nightclubs around the country as part of the New Year's Nation multicity celebration. Also in Los Angeles: Eva Longoria was to host a soiree at her restaurant, Beso; Robin Thicke was to perform at Area (admission: $150); Katy Perry was to perform at Paramount Studios (tickets started at $100); Xzibit was to perform at Apple Lounge (tickets started at $150); Moby, Paul Oakenfold and other DJs were to spin under circus-style tents downtown at Giant Maximus (tickets started at $70)

Foreign-language Oscar a magnet for controversy

LOS ANGELES (Hollywood Reporter) – Pity the foreign-language committee of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences. No group works as hard watching so many difficult films. And yet no group takes as much grief for its choices.

That's what happens when the normal discontentment about Oscar choices goes global. The complaining can get loud.

This year, the rules for the foreign-language category again have been tweaked to limit oversights, and committee leaders generally are trying to learn from past flare-ups. No language controversies, the Academy hopes, a la the one over Israel's "The Band's Visit" last year. No debates over whether a submission actually comes from a bona fide country, like the flap over Palestinian entry "Divine Intervention" in 2002. No snubs of difficult material, like Romania's abortion-focused "4 Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days" last year. This year, it's going to be different.

But given the history of this difficult category -- voters, after all, have to compare dozens of divergent films and film cultures -- should we really be surprised if the announcement of the shortlist of nine next month brings more hand-wringing?

First, a quick history. After years of getting tarred with the tag of predictability, the foreign-language committee two years ago overhauled its system. Instead of having several hundred members choose five nominees, that group could now name nine. A separate body of 30 members would then be convened to narrow the list to five nominees. The premise was that by allowing nearly twice as many films on the shortlist, there'd be fewer possibilities for an oversight.

That seemed like a good idea -- until last year, when such edgier films as "4 Months" and France's "Persepolis" were excluded from the nine by the seemingly conservative voting committee. It turns out that giving a group more nominee slots doesn't change their sensibility; it just gives them more chances to make head-scratching choices.

So this year, the executive committee of the foreign-language committee -- yes, the bureaucratic names can be more impenetrable than a Fassbinder film -- is taking back some of the power it delegated. It's allowing the larger group to choose only six of the nine. Then the executive committee is coming in and choosing three films of its own.

"Historically, the general committee has a particular kind of member that may overlook something formally or thematically new or different or challenging. And though I don't love the word, I think we might be able to correct that a little," says Mark Johnson, chairman of the Academy's foreign-language film committee.

The foreign-language group is like a constant gardener: It's always pruning, hoping the field looks better today than it did yesterday. And in many ways, it does. The lists of five nominees now, as a rule, contain fewer gaffes or serious omissions, even as the Academy must cope with a mindblowingly large pool of films thanks to burgeoning film regions including Eastern Europe and Latin America.

But this year's rule changes, while solving one problem, open the door to another.

If the executive committee's three slots are meant as a corrective, might it be tempted to use that power for reasons of politics instead of substance? Let's say the initial group doesn't choose "The Class." French filmmaker Laurent Cantet's picture is, undeniably, a great film and should be nominated. But will the executive committee feel pressure to choose it simply because it would be too embarrassing to omit a Palme d'Or winner? What happens, then, in a year when a more questionable Palme choice is made?

There's another long-standing problem that the new rules don't address: Unlike the Globes, the Oscars use a "one country, one submission" procedure. The system is designed to manage the overall number of films (a record 67 were submitted this year) while giving every country an ostensibly equal shot at the prize.

That's all well and good. The problem, though, is that it means worthy candidates are overlooked even before the Academy gets a chance to weigh in. Last year, France had to decide between "Persepolis" and "La Vie en Rose"; this year, Gauls had to pick among "The Class" and the equally worthy "A Christmas Tale" and "I've Loved You So Long." Filmmakers like Pedro Almodovar have been snubbed by their country. One film per country means some of the best movies are eliminated right off the bat.

The Academy leadership acknowledges the problem but says there isn't much it can do; it doesn't want to wade into the politics of each country by choosing for it, and it can't throw open the doors to multiple submissions because it can't reasonably be expected to consider hundreds of films.

But why not do something else? Why not allow a country to claim a wild card, say, once every five years? If France feels it has a particularly strong year -- or, for that matter, if the Academy does -- it could use the card to get two French films in that year. This way, the number of films stays manageable but a great film isn't excluded simply because it shares a homeland with another strong title.

This year, there's the usual deep stable of buzz candidates. "Waltz With Bashir," "Everlasting Moments," "The Class" and "Gomorrah" -- from Israel, Sweden, France and Italy, respectively -- all hold pole positions at the moment. And Norway's "O'Horten," Jordan's "Captain Abu Raed," Russia's "Mermaid," Turkey's "Three Monkeys," South Africa's "Jerusalema" and Colombia's "Dog Eat Dog" all have received attention for good reason. Lately, Kazakhstan's "Tulpan" has come on the scene as a dark horse after winning some fest awards. And don't rule out Germany's Golden Globe nominee "The Baader Meinhof Complex," which has drawn headlines because of its controversial subject.

That list alone comes to 12 films. That means at least one-quarter of these contenders will be left off the shortlist, which in turns means we can get ready for more second-guessing.

It wouldn't be the foreign-language Oscar race without it.

Tina Fey voted AP Entertainer of the Year

NEW YORK – Tina Fey is the entertainer of the year? You betcha.

Fey was voted The Associated Press' Entertainer of the Year, an annual honor chosen by newspaper editors and broadcast producers across the country. Fey was selected by AP members as the performer who had the greatest impact on culture and entertainment in 2008.

The 38-year-old comedian bested runner-up Robert Downey Jr., whose comeback was capped with the blockbuster smash "Iron Man," and the third-place vote-getter, Heath Ledger, who posthumously wowed audiences as the Joker in "The Dark Knight."

But it was Fey who most impressed voters largely with her indelible impression of Gov. Sarah Palin on "Saturday Night Live." Her cameos on her old show (where she had been a head writer until 2006) helped drive the show to record ratings and eventually drew an appearance from Palin herself.

"Tina Fey is such an obvious choice," said Sharon Eberson, entertainment editor of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. "She gave us funny when we really needed it and, in a year when women in politics were making huge strides, Fey stood out in the world of entertainment."

Fey's 2008 was a full year, though.

She also starred for the first time on the big screen in "Baby Mama" (which grossed $60 million at the box office) and won three Emmys for her critically lauded NBC sitcom "30 Rock," which she created, stars in and writes. In the comedy series category, she won for best lead actress and best writing, and shared in the award for best comedy series.

"She simultaneously entertained us with her wit and put a mirror up to the nation during the election and made us think about what was going on," said Scott Shive, assistant features editor at the Lexington Herald-Leader. "She is the epitome of the smart kid coming out on top for once."

As soon as Palin was chosen as Sen. John McCain's running mate, conjecture mounted that the similar-looking Fey would have to return to "SNL" to play her.

In an interview earlier this fall, Fey recalled watching early TV coverage of Palin: "That was the first time I thought, `Well, I kinda do look like her. I'd better really listen to how this lady talks.'"

Fey debuted the impression on the "SNL" season premiere and a sensation quickly followed. She made four more pre-election appearances as Palin on the late-night satire.

"From the winks to the nods to the accent, she nailed it," said Marc Bona, assistant entertainment editor of the Plain Dealer in Cleveland. "And she did so at a time when it seemed the whole country was tuned in — both to the presidential race as well as 'Saturday Night Live.'"

Her Palin impression has benefited "30 Rock," too. The show premiered its fourth season to 8.5 million viewers, a million more than last year's opener.

Recently, she was also nominated for a Golden Globe (for best performance by an actress in a TV series, comedy or musical), as well as a Screen Actors Guild award.

"The `SNL' stuff has certainly changed things for me," Fey said in October. "A lot more people seem to know who I am."

Last year's AP Entertainer of the Year also went to a comedian whose satire blended in with politics: Stephen Colbert.